The exception 1.-the economy of the agreement not to continue transactions whose good value is sold.- Sellers of the good value of a business may agree with the buyer to refrain from a similar transaction within certain local limits, provided that the buyer or anyone who derives ownership of it from the value of a business there engages in a similar activity. such restrictions appear appropriate to the Court of Justice, given the nature of the transaction. In this case, the Supreme Court found that section 27 could not be explicitly set aside for all agreements (except one exception) and that there were no two meanings to be attributed to the section. The vulnerability test in England cannot be applied in India. Although Section 27 of the Act clearly states that any non-competition agreement is null and clear and does not engage the contracting parties, several decisions stipulate that a negative clause would not be considered reluctant to trade in an agreement to promote trade. As with other treaties, it is considered that the restriction of trade agreements is, on its face, valid and applicable. While the employer had to first demonstrate that the implementation of the trade restriction was fair and in the public interest, it is now incumbent on the worker to explain why, in particular circumstances, the application of the legislation is contrary to the public interest. In this case, two similar contractors have agreed in partnership that only one of their plants will operate at the same time and that the profits be distributed among them. This deduction has been validated. Confidential information, trade secrets, contact information and customer lists, as well as the company`s good corporat are examples of interests to be protected. However, interest in eliminating competition and investing time and capital in worker training are not included. The common law developed with modified commercial conditions.

In the early 17th century, for example, Rogers v Parry[4] felt that a carpenter`s promise not to leave his home for 21 years was enforceable against him, for the time and place were safe. It was also decided (by Chief Justice Coke) that a man cannot commit not to use his trade in general. Therefore, to confirm negative agreements in employment contracts or contracts, the following appropriate restrictions may be imposed: an inappropriate restriction is contrary to the public interest and is therefore not applicable. The relevance of a trade clause or trade agreement is assessed on two bases: the interests widely expressed by the Community and the interests of the parties themselves. In the common law, a review of reason is followed. A trade agreement applies if: some agreements are only detrimental to society.