The concept of a good contract means that the two people enter into the agreement of their own free will and no one has been forced to sign. If there is a coercion, the court will not consider the complaint. For example, a person cannot be forced to sign a contract with threats or violence. Not all agreements between the parties are contracts. It must be clear that the parties intended to enter into a legally binding contract. If the contract does not comply with the legal requirements that are considered a valid contract, the law does not enforce the contractual agreement and the aggrieved party is not obliged to compensate the non-infringing party. In other words, the plaintiff (a non-dented party) in a contractual dispute suing the criminal party can only obtain reimbursement of the damages-expectations if he is able to prove that the alleged contract was in place and that it was a valid and enforceable contract. In this case, the expected damages are awarded, which attempt to make the non-injurious part a while attributing the amount that the party would have paid in the absence of a breach of contract, plus the reasonably foreseeable damages suffered by the offence. It should be noted, however, that there is no punitive damages for contractual remedies and that the non-injurious party should not receive more than the expectation (the monetary value of the mission if it had been completed in full). With respect to trade agreements, it is generally accepted that the parties intended to enter into a contract.

However, in certain circumstances, certain commitments that are not considered contracts may be applied to a limited extent. If one party relied on the other party`s assurances/promises to its detriment, the court may apply a just doctrine of Promissory Estoppel to compensate the non-injurious party to compensate the party for the amount it received from the appropriate appeal of the party to the agreement. As an essential part of an enforceable contract, the consideration is equivalent to financial compensation or a commitment. This consideration may also prevent another party from taking legal action in the contract right dispute. The agreement of both parties must be clearly stated in the contract in order for it to be enforceable. A value exchange must also be available for a consideration to be valid. For a contract to be legally enforceable, it must contain the following provisions: it is difficult to make a definitive statement on errors; they must be challenged and brought to justice to determine whether they render the contract unenforceable. Fraud is a premeditated act that deprives someone of their right or has a violation. In the treaties, it is a deception of a (significant) material part of the treaty.

Fraud can be positive (lie) or negative (not telling the truth or the whole truth). If it can be proven that one of the parties is in a state of fraud, the contract may be unenforceable. That is the problem of an unenforceable treaty; You don`t know until you try to bring the contract to court that it can`t be enforced. Until then, it is often too late to solve the problem. So before you sign on the dotted line, make sure the contract you signed is applicable. The purpose of the contract must be final for the contract to be applicable.